This is simply intolerable. The site FaithFreedom.org is a terrible site. It has all kinds of information about Islam and its prophet. That is completely unacceptable as Muslims do not like it. When Muslims read it, many get very upset. Which is not a good thing. The government of India must take immediate action and block the site just like it banned “The Satanic Verses” and other things that Muslims find offensive. It will lead to communal violence. For peace and harmony, the government of India must ban FaithFreedom.org. That site is dangerous and I call for its immediate ban.
Please join me and Zameer Ahmed Jumlana, Secretary All India Committee, Indian National League, Mobile: 9811531096, to demand the site be banned. Mr Jumlana has written to Y. S. Dadwal, Commissioner of Delhi Police, INDIA. He wrote, and I quote:
My attention is being drawn about Anti-Islamic provocative website http://www.faithfreedom.org. I personally check the website which contains the Alleged Pictures of Prophet Muhammad . . . which are forbidden according to teachings of Islam.
The details are at Atlas Shrugs. Forbidden according to Islam — which means that it is forbidden to everyone — whether a follower of Islam or not. I urge the Commissioner of Delhi Police to issue an international warrant for the arrest of Mr Ali Sina. He has gone against the law of god and has insulted 1.5 billion Muslims. There can be riots and bombings as a result. For peace and tranquility, I demand that Mr Ali Sina be tried immediately for being the primary cause of communal hatred, violence, murder, killing, rape, and theft.
Mr Ali Sina is a dangerous man. He’s a bigot. He is a danger to the whole world. Just see how terrible his response to Mr Jumlana is. Ali Sina, the demagogue, writes: (Caution: Reader is advised to not read any more if he or she is of a delicate nature and is easily offended. You are warned. Not safe for children or anyone of childish mentality. You proceed at your own risk.)
Response by Mr. Ali Sina:
Dear Mr. Zameer Ahmed Jumlana,
Showing the pictures of Muhammad is forbidden by the teachings of Islam. However, we are not Muslims and we do not abide by the teachings of Islam. Isn’t it absurd that you expect everyone to live by your dictums?
Muslims are in violation of the laws that are the hallmark of the civilized people, such as the Golden Rule, the Human Rights, the equality of genders, the freedom of speech, the freedom of belief, etc. These are the laws that matter to us. They don’t matter to you, because they are not part of your laws.
Just as you file a complaint against us for violating your laws, we are taking you to court for violating our laws.
Which court? The court of the public opinion! It is in this court that we are exposing the deception, the violence, and the hate that is so intrinsic in the religion that you espouse. We are fighting the lies of Islam with truth and winning the minds and hearts of thousands of people, both Muslims and non-Muslims.
Can you defend Islam? Can you prove that what we allege against your faith and its monstrous prophet are untrue? No you cannot. When it comes to logic you are helpless. You cannot defend your evil belief with logic. There is nothing you can do, but to bring legal charges to stop us from revealing the truth about your cherished faith.
You can’t. There is no law that can stop us from telling the truth about any faith, at least not where I live. Here we practice freedom of speech and criticizing religions, including Islam is our birth right.
This is the freedom that you Muslims have always enjoyed, but have denied to others. You think it is okay to destroy churches, synagogues, temples and the houses of worships of other faiths, trash their religions and criticize them. You think it is okay for your prophet to call the Jews, maghdhoob (hated by God), the Christians, gone astray and the Hindus, polytheists and najes (filthy), but you cry like a baby when someone criticizes your faith.
Those are fighting words. He calls Mr Jumlana a cry baby. Now you tell me if that Ali Sina is a dangerous man or not. Mr Jumlana has made a very reasonable demand. He has demanded that nobody do anything that is forbidden by Islam and that all people are required to do as Islam commands. What could be more reasonable. Yet Mr Ali Sina persists with his opposition to being dictated to. Sina is totally out of line here and he should be put in his place as soon as possible. And that place is a prison, if not from a hanging pole.
Mr Sina continues:
Seven innocent Baha’is in Iran are being prosecuted, as I write these notes. They may face execution, because they are accused of “waging war against God and spreading corruption on Earth.” The punishment for these offences in Islam is death. You are not offended by this gross violation of human rights, but you are offended if we show the pictures of Muhammad?
See how unreasonable Mr Sina is. Where does Islam say that Baha’is should not be persecuted. If Islam allows it, that settles it. Islam says that pictures of Muhammad is offensive. So therefore it is. Which part of this does not Mr Ali Sina not understand? Some people can be so utterly unreasonable.
Have you ever thought why Muhammad disallowed his followers to depict him? In his later years, Muhammad suffered from the degenerative disease of achromegaly. Thanks to this disease his bones and cartilages grew disproportionately. His facial features were deformed. He looked like a monster. But Muhammad was also a narcissist and he was very concerned about his image. Consequently, he forbade his followers to depict him. He did not want the posterity to see how ugly he looked. If you want to really know how Muhammad looked, please read my book, Understanding Muhammad: A Psychobiography of Allah’s Prophet. I have unearthed his description, narrated by his nearest and dearest.
You went on to accuse us of “imposing” anti-Islamic propaganda on ardent Muslims.
Really? Have we ever called for jihad against ardent Muslims? Have we said anywhere that Muslims should recant their faith, pay jizyah, or they should be killed? Where is this imposition you are talking about? You fail to see that Muhammad imposed his diabolic faith on others thorugh his numerour ghazwas (raids), that your ancestors and mine were massacred, raped and forced into conversion, but you see an Internet site as an imposition? If a Muslim does not want to read our site, all he has to do is click out of it. Can a Muslim who does not want to remain a Muslim click out of his faith? What will happen to him if he does? Can non-Muslims living in Islamic countries prctice their faith freely? Have you read about the recent violence against the Copts in Egypet? Have you heard of innocent Muslims in Pakistan accused of blasphemy ane lynched by Muslim goons?
Your ancestors, like mine, were buchered and raped by marauding Muslims, and now you are defending the barbaric faith of their abusers? You and I don’t owe any alligiance to the demnic faith of the murderers of our ancestors. Wake up Mr. Jumlana. Don’t betray your own people, your own ancestors, your own culture. Have you become the defender of a cult that destroyed them? Instead of defending the filthy cult of a monster you should defend your own cultuer. You are a Hindu, Be proud of your heritage that has contributed to humanity so much.
I am offended by what Mr Sina writes. I object in the most forceful of terms. I demand in the name of all things holy and sacred that he be immediately arrested. Perhaps a red-letter warrant (or is it red-corner warrant) be issued by Interpol and MI-5 and the FBI and CIA and the NIA (that’s the Indian investigative agency, for those international readers of this blog) and Mr Sina be immediately arrested. Have I said that Mr Sina is a danger to civilization and to all creation? If I have not, it is high time I did. Mr Sina is a danger to civilization and to all creation. There.
It is amazing how Muslims can be so genuinely hypocritical. You accuse us of something that befits Islam. FFI does not have means of torture to impose anything. Any time a Muslim can’t handle us, relief is a click away. But they are coming. They are reading what we write and they are leaving Islam. We do not impose our views, but the truth is compelling.
Well, Mr. Zameer Ahmed Jumlana. Unlike Muslims I am a fair person and would like to give you the opportunity to defend your faith. Show us that Islam is a religion from God and not an idiotic faith concocted by a mentally and physically sick individual. Prove us wrong and I will not only publish your rebuttal, but also announce publicly that I was wrong and even will give you $50,000 dollars as reward.
That is not all. I am going to do something that is inconceivable for Muslims and may even shock the non-Muslims. We have a blog section in this site. I am going to let Muslims to run their blogs. Yes that is right! From today, I announce that the blog section of FFI is open to all those who want to prove us wrong. We are working on a new application for this site that will be easier to use. It will be launched in about a week. I am going to create a new chapter in the blogs section for Muslims to respond to all the charges made against Muhammad and Islam.
How about that for freedom of speech? Of course Muslims have been always free to post anything in the forum and in the comments section of faithfreedom.org, but now they can also write blogs refuting FFI right on FFI. Show me one Islamic site that allows opposing comments, let alone giving their critics blogs to refute them.
So, Dear Mr. Jumlana, instead of crying like a baby and complaining to authorities, please act maturely and start refuting what you believe are “distortions” in our site.
There he goes again. Mr Sina and his potty mouth — calling dear Mr Jumlana a cry baby. Would you stand for it? You should not. You should call for the decapitation of Mr Sina. I hereby announce a reward of Rs 50 (about US$1.12 at current exchange rates) to anyone who would murder Mr Sina.
This offer is open to all Muslims. Muslims can now have their own blogs to refute us on FFI. I have a hunch that their blogs will be very popular, provided they write scholarly articles. But be also prepared to be debunked and refuted. You are free to write anything and you readers are free to comment and show your errors.
There are some conditions.
1- You must not use copy pasted articles from other writers. What you publish on FFI must be your own writing.
2- Your articles must be in response to the charges made against Muhammad. The intent is to prove FFI is wrong and Islam is indeed a true religion.
Are you up to the challenge? If we are distorting the facts, as you accuse us, it should be easy for you to prove us wrong. The antidote to lies is truth. Show us the truth and debunk everything we say, in konta men al sadeqeen.
By searching your name in Google, I see you are a professional complainer to authorities and an avid lawsuit maker. But I did not find any scholarly article penned by you about Islam. I hope you will be able to defend your faith logically now that you have exposed yourself to all and sundry. Don’t try to bully the critics of Islam to silence, it won’t work anymore. Instead try to refute them wrong, if you can.
Wish you the best
The man says “wish you the best”! Did you read that! What sort of a demented crazed bigoted murderous evil satanic spawn is the man!
I will personally write to Mr Manmohan Singh and his boss and demand that he spend a few sleepless nights just worrying about the injustice that FaithFreedom.org is doing. Please join me now. Please go to www.faithfreedom.org now and register your protest and read what they write. Horrible stuff, I tell you, horrible stuff.
UPDATE: July 2011 — This post is written tongue-in-cheek. It should be clear that I support Mr Ali Sina, and that I am a freedom of expression and speech fundamentalist. Anyone who believes that I am actually against Ali Sina has not understood the real message. In fact, Ali Sina has read this post and understands that I am a friend and well-wisher of his.
Added Nov 2012: I have closed comments to this post. Thanks all.