18 thoughts on “AMA — the Milton Friedman edition

  1. baransam1 Wednesday June 12, 2019 / 9:42 pm

    Can you please give excerpts/examples from Niti Aayog’s India@75 strategy that you did not like? I saw your tweet and it seems you are mighty displeased with the strategy document.
    On a different note, is there a typo in the heading? It should be AMA, instead of AKA.

    Like

    • Atanu Dey Wednesday June 12, 2019 / 9:58 pm

      Thanks for pointing out the typo regarding the heading, which should have been AMA instead of AKA. Fixed that.

      Like

    • Atanu Dey Wednesday June 12, 2019 / 9:59 pm

      What part of Niti Aayog’s strategy I don’t like?

      No part. The whole idea of central planning is flawed. Niti Aayog has to be scrapped, not just any of its reports.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. keshavbedi Wednesday June 12, 2019 / 11:33 pm

    Are you acquainted with the works of C K Raju?

    Liked by 1 person

    • Atanu Dey Thursday June 13, 2019 / 9:49 am

      I did not know about C.K.Raju. I checked the wiki page on him. It appears that he’s quite accomplished.

      Like

      • keshavbedi Friday June 14, 2019 / 9:51 am

        I saw his lecture on Mathematics vs Ganita where he states important things which aren’t in discussion or discourse even today. No popular scientist or mathematician that I have heard acknowledges what Raju is saying.
        Which makes me wonder if what he is saying is true or not.

        Like

        • Ajit R. Jadhav Friday June 14, 2019 / 5:01 pm

          Dear Keshav,

          I watched a few minutes of this lengthy lecture out of curiosity, and since it came without the attendant benefit of easy access to the accompanying slides, mostly at random. In all, I watched about 5 minutes of his talk. I think I do get a sense of the level at which he was speaking.

          If you would kind enough to compile a list of the things which he says and which you don’t understand, personally, then I guess I should be able to help. Coming to the truth question, I should also always be able to tell if something is true, to the best of my knowledge, or not. But the “not-known-true-to-me” category could very well include a wide spectrum of things—right from ignorance to the speaker’s glaring (objectively demonstrable) errors. So, there. … Somehow I feel sure that you wouldn’t pursue this project—not immediately, anyway.

          Best,

          Ajit

          Like

        • Atanu Dey Sunday June 16, 2019 / 1:01 pm

          I attempted to watch the video but the form put me off. He is hard to follow and he rambles. I don’t have the time to plod through it.

          Like

  3. Ajit R. Jadhav Thursday June 13, 2019 / 12:50 pm

    Any tips for (literally) surviving in India, esp. in today’s India? Assume that a well-educated engineer (MTech (IIT), PhD (Engg.)) has raised this question.

    Best,

    –Ajit

    Like

    • Atanu Dey Sunday June 16, 2019 / 1:04 pm

      To survive anywhere, not just in India, one has to create value. The fact is that we depend on what others produce. We get what they produce only by producing something that those others would be willing to take from us in exchange. Easier said than done.

      Liked by 1 person

  4. baransam1 Wednesday June 19, 2019 / 9:05 pm

    What are your thoughts on planned data-localization restrictions to be set by the Indian government on Googles, Facebooks etc?

    Like

  5. baransam1 Wednesday July 3, 2019 / 9:53 pm

    If somebody is willing to sell and somebody willing to buy, it should be allowed. Right?
    So if somebody wants to sell addictive-drugs and somebody wants to buy it (like heroin/brown-sugar) so be it.
    Are you comfortable with this idea of a free market for drugs?

    Like

    • Atanu Dey Thursday July 4, 2019 / 4:22 pm

      Yes, all voluntary exchanges among consenting adults must be allowed, whether it be drugs or prostitution or labor. What matters is the agreement of the parties to a trade, not some third party. If you don’t like drugs, don’t buy or sell drugs, and don’t take drugs.

      Maybe that drugs are harmful to the user. Well, so what? If a person willingly harms himself, on what moral or ethical grounds is someone else justified in interfering with what a free person does?

      Milton Friedman had pointed out that if he know that a person was committing a “sin”, then he is morally obliged to stop the person from sinning. But — and that’s the bind — he said that he can never be so arrogant as to decide for another whether it is a sin or not. Basically he argued for epistemological modesty. Don’t assume that you know what is good or bad for another. If there are no victims from a particular act, then you have a moral obligation to not interfere in the act.

      Like

      • baransam1 Thursday July 4, 2019 / 9:23 pm

        Thanks. Though the answer is obvious after you have quoted Friedman, I will still ask the question to be absolutely sure.
        Question: There are consenting adults who want to commit suicide. Assume, I open a business which offers exotic and very satisfying pre-suicide and suicide experience. If you are in government, will you stop me?

        Like

Comments are closed.