I have consistently argued for years that the greatest enemy of the Indian people is the government of India.
India doesn’t have to be pathetically poor. But the government makes sure that Indians remain poor by preventing them from creating wealth. It’s a toxic mixture of idiocy, greed, and stupidity of the politicians and their bureaucratic minions. Why is this so? I believe the stage was set by the British.
The Anti-prosperity Machine
The British imposed an extractive and exploitative government on India. They created the original “anti-prosperity machine”. That is natural, expected and entirely reasonable since the British were colonizers. Colonizers don’t colonize out of altruism. They do it to — let me repeat that — to exploit and extract. The Indian government is a British creation, designed with the specific purpose of keeping the Indian people under its control. After the British left, those who took over realized that as the new masters, the system suited them perfectly well. All the talk about Indians gaining freedom from an oppressive government is a lot of hogwash that only the stupidly deluded can believe. Indians are still enslaved. They are still not free to create wealth. Here’s an example I came across in a hard-hitting piece by Raghav Bahl.
Modi allowing DACOIT-y
China and the US have globe-spanning mega corporations. No reason India can’t have them too — except for the fact that the Indian government does not allow it. Raghav Bahl explains how Indian laws hobble Indian digital corporations.
Raghav Bahl writes:
Simply put, America and China enable their iconic founders to raise astronomical amounts of capital – cleverly, and ironically, Chinese companies scoop up landfills of dollars on American stock exchanges to build Chinese assets – even as they are assured of retaining control via specially designed financial instruments, structures, incentives, and rights.
But Indian Entrepreneurs Are Trussed Up…
As opposed to such aggressive institutional backing, Indian entrepreneurs are trussed up in archaic laws. Not allowed to issue differential voting shares. Not allowed to issue non-voting stock. Severely constrained in issuing and pricing cross-border quasi-equity/debt structures, perpetual bonds, warrants, convertibles, puts, calls, tracking stocks or options. Cannot list on overseas exchanges unless the entity is listed in India (there has, lately, been a marginal, grudging relaxation of this).
Mantra Should be To Empower And Liberate
Whenever I have tried to explain this critical difference between ownership and control to officials at the Reserve Bank of India, the Securities and Exchange Board of India, NITI Aayog and the Ministry of Finance, I have encountered blank expressions, followed by suspicion and disapproval. They just don’t get it.
Read more at Why Is PM Modi Allowing DACOIT-y On Indian Digital Startups?
Was very curious as to what your thoughts on Jordan Peterson were. Here’s one of the interviews that made him famous:
LikeLiked by 1 person
haha very interesting you are asking atanu about JP. Something I have thought about too.
I’ve been following JP for a long time, thinking of how much atanu hates christianity, he won’t be a huge fan of JP given JP believes the psychological tenants (not literal stories) of christianity are responsible for the west’s success.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Not just Christianity, my antipathy is towards all monotheistic religions, especially Islam. I admire Gore Vidal immensely. I agree with him assessment that “the great unmentionable evil at the center of our culture is monotheism.” Read his essay “Monotheism and its Discontents.“
LikeLike
Jordan Peterson is a valuable addition to the public dialog. Not that I agree with him on everything but by and large he’s OK by my estimation. He’s a good counter to the social justice warriors and their vacuous nonsense.
LikeLike
Raghav thinks indian companies will compete with fb and google, what’s he smoking??!!
Totally agree with his shares and control part though..
LikeLiked by 2 people